From comprehensive outsourcing of intricate functions like Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS) services, or component manufacturing to modest contracts with local service providers and suppliers, organizations spanning various sectors and scales place significant reliance on third-party service organizations.

Engaging in outsourcing activities yields benefits such as cost reductions, operational efficiencies, and the infusion of specialized expertise into the organization. However, outsourcing also broadens the spectrum of potential risks an organization must contend with. In light of this, comprehending, evaluating, and adeptly addressing these risks as part of an enterprise risk management (ERM) framework is imperative to mitigate the exposure to financial losses, regulatory non-compliance, and reputational harm.

Gaining Insight into Third-Party Risk: It’s important to note that third-party risk isn’t exclusive to multinational corporations that outsource major business functions to offshore vendors. In the contemporary business landscape, most organizations regularly interact with service organizations as an integral aspect of their day-to-day operations, as previously discussed. Even smaller enterprises rely on service organizations for diverse activities, ranging from server hosting and IT support to salary processing. The growth of third-party outsourcing inherently heightens the potential risks to which organizations are subject.

The continuous analysis of third-party risk at any given juncture holds significance for ensuring business continuity and optimizing the effectiveness of risk management endeavors. Given the considerable reliance on data across most businesses, any third party granted access to sensitive or confidential information may potentially pose a risk to business continuity. Just as in other risk categories, outsourcing risks can be evaluated based on degrees and hierarchies. These hierarchies and degrees constitute the foundation for risk prioritization by management and shape the risk framework presented in an ISAE 3402 | SOC1 report.

Prioritizing Risks and ISAE 3402: It’s crucial to recognize that prioritizing risks is an ongoing process. All parameters should be adaptable over time, influenced by factors ranging from economic shifts to changes in the regulatory landscape and evolving strategic initiatives. While this is not an exhaustive list, service organizations that generally entail a higher degree of risk for your organization include:

  • Cloud computing/on-demand computing
  • Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)
  • Internet service providers (ISPs)
  • Credit card processing platforms
  • Online order fulfillment
  • Data center and co-location providers
  • HR and payroll services
  • Third-party administrators (TPAs)
  • Print and mail services
  • Third-party logistics (3PL) services
  • Accounts receivable processing and debt collection services
  • Third-party due diligence

Conducting thorough due diligence before entering into a new third-party contract serves as a foundational step. Similar to enterprise risks, third-party risks should be consistently and proactively managed throughout the duration of a vendor relationship, given that parameters evolve with time. This approach entails harnessing the capabilities of internal audit, finance, legal, and, in many instances, independent auditors capable of providing an ISAE 3402 assurance opinion.

Securance is well-equipped to assist you in achieving compliance with ISAE 3402, SOC 1, ISAE 3000, SOC 2, ISO 27001, and ISO 9001. Feel free to reach out to us for assistance or advice.

Share this blog

February 13, 2024

A vulnerability scan, penetration test (pentest) and Red Teaming are...

    November 3, 2023

    “Although we were under the assumption that processes had been...

    November 3, 2023

    “Although we were under the assumption that processes had been...